Windows Embedded Blog bsquare
   
 
windows embedded blog
April 7th, 2008 SD vs. MMC
May 9th, 2008 Adapting the Sample Host Controller
May 14th, 2008 Understanding Critical Section Deadlocks in Windows CE 6
More > > > > > >
 
 
Windows Embedded Blog questions
 
Windows Embedded Blog experts
 
Windows Embedded Blog updates
Email:

 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RETURN TO BLOG HOME

VISIT WWW.BSQUARE.COM

  August 21st , 2006
___________________________________________
The New Windows CE6 Memory Model Continued

User Mode and Kernel Mode Drivers

My name is Dean Ramsier, and I’m a developer in the Professional Engineering Services group here at BSQUARE. I came to BSQUARE from Vibren Technologies and Accelent Systems where I primarily developed Board Support Packages for Windows CE. I’m currently working with the Windows CE6 beta.

The development team at Microsoft has made a number of changes to the architecture of Windows CE in version 6.0. The support for a virtually unlimited address space and number of processes has gotten much of the attention, but there are a number of other changes that are significant as well. One of these is a new model for loading device drivers that can provide for increased security, robustness or performance.

Prior to CE6, device drivers primarily resided in the device.exe process. Device.exe was a process like any other application, subject to the same memory limitations and performance issues resulting from interprocess calls back and forth between the application, driver, filesystem and kernel. In addition, since all drivers were located in the same process space a corrupt driver could potentially fault the entire process, shutting down all drivers.

The new kernel architecture provides more flexibility by providing two different driver models. The old device.exe functionality has been moved into the kernel, and a new user device process (udevice.exe) has been introduced. This change results in two different driver models, kernel mode drivers and user mode drivers. BSP developers must choose how each of their drivers will be implemented on a particular platform.

Kernel Mode Drivers

Kernel mode drivers are loaded by device.dll inside of the kernel. This is the default behavior, and most closely resembles the old device.exe model. The big win here is performance – the expensive interprocess calls (thunks) have been eliminated. There is no need for the user mode process initiating a driver access to be switched out, because the user mode process coexists with the kernel. The kernel includes the file system and device drivers so everything is resident in memory at the same time.

This new performance benefit comes at a price. Kernel mode drivers are now a part of the kernel, and they have full privileges for the entire kernel address space. A driver failure that results in memory corruption could easily bring down the kernel and with it the entire system. Therefore it’s critical that kernel mode drivers be robust.

A flaw in a driver can bring down the entire kernel? Isn’t this going backwards? While this failure mode sounds bad (and it is) the end result isn’t really any different from the old model. The analog in CE5 is to bring down the device.exe process and with it all the remaining device drivers. That failure is likely to have the same overall effect on most platforms. However there is another option in CE6.

User Mode Drivers

CE6 provides a new mechanism to load drivers into individual user mode processes (called udevice.exe) instead of into the kernel. A driver that loads in this fashion is called a user mode driver, and it gives up a level of performance in return for increased system robustness and security. In addition, since user mode drivers run inside a user mode process they are restricted in their use of certain APIs such as VirtualCopy (look for a future blog entry for more details on these new API restrictions). This security feature restricts drivers loading in user mode from arbitrarily accessing any hardware resource in the system.

Microsoft has designed the user mode driver model to have a very high level of compatibility with kernel mode drivers. There are very few differences between the two models, and a driver written for user mode can be loaded into kernel mode with no changes. A new kernel component called the user mode driver reflector handles the interface between user mode applications and the user mode driver. This means that applications do not need to be aware of how a particular driver was loaded.

It’s a simple matter to load a driver into user mode instead of the default kernel mode. There is a new bit defined in the Flags registry key that if set tells the kernel to load the corresponding driver into user mode. That’s it – nothing more to it. The user mode driver will run in its own process isolated from the kernel and the rest of the system. If the driver fails for some reason only its copy of udevice.exe is affected, the rest of the system should remain intact.

BSP developers now have the option of choosing between a high performance kernel mode driver and a more protected user mode driver. Untrusted third party drivers can be loaded into user mode to increase system security and robustness. Unstable or otherwise questionable drivers can start life in user mode and then be moved to kernel mode as they become proven. It will be interesting to see how this new driver model will be used by the CE community.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dean Ramsier
Senior Software Engineer
Professional Engineering Services
BSQUARE Corporation | Contact Me!